portra 160 vs 400
Kodak released their first Portra films in 1999 to accompany their Pro (including Vericolor) and Gold lines. We primarily shoot with Fuji 400H and love how it renders, so we don’t tend to shoot Portra 400 during the day. The new film is easy to scan, according to reviews. We have seen examples of Portra 400 pushed, even 3 stops. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. The camera used was a Mamiya 645 Pro TL and three lenses were used: 80mm f/2.8 N, 150mm f/3.5 N, 300mm f/5.6 N-ULD. For an additional reference of Portra 400 shot and developed at 800, please refer to this article. Overall, I preferred Portra 800 over 160 and 400 in most situations with a strict exception to portraits. Is this based on experience or just some thought that 400 film must be? Ektar is a 100 speed, extremely finely grained C-41 substitute for slide film and Portra is an amazing portrait film with great skin tones. The Film World Takes a Giant Step Towards the Grave With Just One Word: ‘Discontinued’, Nearly 15 Times Bigger Than Full Frame and Considerably Cheaper: Fstoppers Reviews the Intrepid 4x5 MK4, A Primer to Shooting Film in 2020: Film Stocks, The Unofficial Film of the 'Film Look’: A Long-Term Review of Kodak Portra 400, How to Create a Glitch Art Effect in Photoshop, Magnum Publishes a Code of Conduct and Announces an Independent Investigation as David Alan Harvey Takes Legal Action, Processing Images in Black and White for Print, How Bad Is JPEG? Negative - Kodak Portra 400. Check out the Fstoppers Store for in-depth tutorials from some of the best instructors in the business. What changed between the two rolls is the light condition. Apr 7, 2014 #15 Portra 400 was right in the middle but in a scene I would have preferred to remain bright and airy feeling, I preferred no yellow tint. Portra 800 vs Portra 400. Experiment 2: Kodak Portra 160 vs. Portra 400 vs. Portra 800. by Madison Hyer. 2. Both of these films are around the same ISO but quite different in contrast and saturation. The two other film stocks in the Portra lineup, 160 and 800, offer similar color palettes that generally produce pleasing skin tones but their saturation and dynamic range is vastly different. I shoot Portra 400 in 35mm. Just like its higher speed counterpart, Portra 160 quickly found its place in my camera bag. ( Log Out / Images made with 800 look more like a traditional color negative film, which is welcome considering how close to digital perfection images from Portra 160 and 400 can be. For us, Portra 400 has never been a big contender with Portra 800. Soft colors, tons of detail and a dynamic range even better than Ektar. Kodak Portra is said to produce the best skin tones and I did agree but now I am starting to prefer the pinky-green tones of Fuji Pro 400H vs yellow-orange tones of Portra. For me, the most interesting shots came from the Portra 400. It's plenty fine grained enough for me, really superb film. I have a client who wants her daughter's wedding shot with film. All told, we took 3 different sets of portraits (though only posting one) and in all 3, Portra 800 was far too saturated. Kodak Portra 400 and CineStill 800T or Kodak VISION3 500T 5219– the film that provides the base for CineStill 800T – are modern photographic films designed to be used as part of a digital workflow. This means that colors will be rendered differently than other films such as the well-known Fuji 400H. portra 160 vs 400rose cut diamond in a pave setting. Discussion in 'Film and Processing' started by mike_gammill, Feb 9, 2012. I’m not sure that my opinion between the three is really going to change. Portra 400 rated at 800 and pushed one stop is also equally great. In the original article, I used the exact same camera and lens for each series, changing only the back to rotate between the 3 film stocks. I put the data into Excel and cleaned it up a bit (for example, 8 seconds metered exposure time certainly needs more correction than 4 seconds, contrary to the data I got from Peter) and found a best-fit curve. Kodak’s Portra 400 is arguably the most popular color negative film stock in the world right now and for good reason. Finally, for the vertical tunnel at the OSU campus, I really think the saturation of Portra 800 shined. The control conditions were as follows: All films were developed at a local lab here in Columbus, OH and scanned at home using an Epson v600. Portra 160 is the finest grain of the three Portra’s, Its low iso makes it great for daylight shooting and it’s warmth makes it ideal for portraiture. Portra 400 vs. 160. As for pushing film, pushing is when you rate the film HIGHER than the box speed. For the tower, all three returned a pretty distinct color palette – so much so that I went back and rescanned each with the expectation of getting more uniformity then but the scans came back virtually the same as the first pass – that all 3 are distinctly different. Colour film. Cos its ace. Under-exposed images take on the dreaded green shadows so familiar to color negative shooters. To ensure consistency throughout the experiment, all of the shots were taken using the exact same camera/lens combo. Portra 400 x Flash Portra 400 offers a solid balance between creative colour variability and consistency, but is most certainly behaving in a way inconsistent to Portra 160. Portra 400 was introduced back in 1998. We have seen examples of Portra 400 pushed, even 3 stops. In photographic terms, this infusion of VISI… In addition, the Kodak Portra 160 is intended for digital processing. The last update in our recent history occurred in 2011, when Kodak updated their Portra 160 series. In picking the methodology, my intent was to limit variability to the film alone as much as practically possible. Here’s our quick comparison of Kodak Ektar and Kodak Portra 160. Portra 160 is the finest grain of the three Portra’s, Its low iso makes it great for daylight shooting and it’s warmth makes it ideal for portraiture. July 30, 2020. eagles cap space 2021. (Availability info from B&H). It’s so robust it will capture in most genres and Kodak has a range of ISO’s to help you out (160, 400 and 800) and a reputation for being able to push this a number of stops. I will continue to shoot more and more 800 in and around Ohio (or at least on trips where I’m not flying) and I will shoot Portra 400 as an old reliable. Kodak Portra 400, 35mm // Leica M6, Leica 35mm f/2 Summicron. 160 Film KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 160 Film features a significantly finer grain structure for improved scanning and enlargement capability in today's workflow, while retaining the exceptionally smooth and natural skin tone reproduction that the PORTRA Film family is renowned for. So pushing Portra 400 one stop (+1) would be shooting it at 600 iso. CineStill 50D is a relatively new film whereas Kodak Portra has been around for years (in various forms). Photographer and fellow member of the club, Morgan Roberts, also supplied these two images for before and after comparison using the Kodak Portra 160 preset in RNI Films 4 PRO. To accomplish this, 3 different film backs were used, each loaded with a different Kodak Portra film. Anything shot on Kodak Portra film, whether 160, 400, 800, VC or Tungsten, 35mm or 120 or LF - we want it all. UC was not a Portra … And then, to make decisions harder, Kodak introduced the Ultra Color (UC) film in ISOs of 100 and 400. ISO 50 vs ISO 400 = CineStll 50D requires 300% more light that Kodak Portra 400 … READ NEXT – Kodak EKTACHROME Is Back. And of those films, the 400 speed is the most popular as it lets in more light than a film like Kodak’s Portra160. Of the three, Portra 400 is the most popular stock for film photographers and the most popular color profile for those shoot digital that are looking to emulate the film look. It has medium contrast and low saturation making a great alternative to the more saturated Ektar 100. The reproduction of the colors is restrained and quite refreshing, without really looking cool. Thus, the Kodak Portra 160 can be excellently scanned. Similar to the portraits above, Portra 800 tends to turn whites yellow in a fairly unattractive way. The same streamlining happened with the ISO 160 Portra a year later, while the ISO 800 Portra … I honestly expected Portra 160 to shine here but I honestly thought all of the scans turned out equally as pale. (please add 'portra' to your photos' tags) Digital photos with VSCO filters are NOT ALLOWED! The original Portra 400 recipe is one of the most frustrating recipes I’ve created, but it also produces great results sometimes. As for pushing film, pushing is when you rate the film HIGHER than the box speed. For Fuji, it looks likes the only choice you have is Superia 400. Do you think the 400 will have fine enough grain for an 11x14 or should I stick with the 160. Kodak Ektar 100 Vs Portra 400 In Greece – By Aukje August 25, 2016. To a level that I, personally, looked jaundiced. Kodak Ektar VS Kodak Portra 160. Lomography vs. Kodak Portra, a Color Negative Comparison with Negative Feedback! The Kodak Portra 160 is tuned to the reproduction of skin tones in the northwestern culture, he is primarily a portrait film. All of the shots were scanned using an Epson V600 and no further adjusts following the scanner software’s inversion were made. Fujifilm X100T + RNI Kodak Portra 160 Samples. I am using a pair of Mamiya 645E SLR's so I will be using 120 film. They are successors of the professional Vericolor films (VPS and VPL), which succeeded Ektacolor films earlier. Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. (please add 'portra' to your photos' tags) Digital photos with VSCO filters are NOT ALLOWED!
I happen to really like the Porta 400NC myself, and have found it I do expect that I could have remedied a good deal of that in settings in the scan or in PS after but again, all of the presented images are straight out of the scanner’s software. New Kodak Portra 160 Kodak's Portra 160 website Kodak's FAQ Kodak's Tech Pub E-4051 (PDF) 135-36 propack (5 rolls)Catalog# 6031959 120 propack (5 rolls)Catalog# 1808674 220 propack (5 rolls)Catalog# 8273773 10 Sheet 4 x 5 inchCatalog# 1710516 10 Sheet 8 x 10 inchCatalog# 8493751 RULES: 1) Only post photos in the pool with the new Portra 160 film or … In addition, the Kodak Portra 160 is intended for digital processing. As for the other 3 samples, I did strongly prefer Portra 800. Going much easier on this “slower” emulsion, I didn’t do too many crazy things to the new Portra 160. But just then, new Kodak Portra 160 hit the market! Slide - Kodak E100G ... Vintage - Technicolor 2 (Approx.) We primarily shoot with Fuji 400H and love how it renders, so we don’t tend to shoot Portra 400 during the day. Kodak Portra 160 and 400. Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Lenses: 80mm f/2.8 N, 150mm f/3.5 N, 300mm f/5.6 N-ULD, Lighting (Portrait Only): 2 Profoto B1X with diffusers. ( Log Out / Those who need more film speed may be relieved to know that Kodak still offers Portra 400 and 800, both of which are fine films in their own right. I actually think that Portra 160 does a better job with indoor portraits where as Portra 400 is wonderful outside. Surprising Encounters in Landscape Photography, The Death of the Entry-Level DSLR Is Upon Us: Nikon Calls Time on the D3500 and D5600, 7 Editing Techniques Landscape Photographers Should Know, A Beginner's Guide to Effectively Using ISO for Better Photos, An Essay Only Nikon Shooters Will Appreciate. While I know a lot of people love the film, I can count on one hand how many shots I liked from an entire pro pack shot in Banff (albeit, the three I got that were winners were my absolute favorites from the entire trip). Kodak Portra is a family of daylight-balanced professional color negative films originally introduced in 1998 made mainly for portrait and wedding applications. So in 2010, Kodak Portra 400 NC and Kodak Portra VC 400 both ceased to exist as they merged together and became the simple, singular Kodak Portra 400 we have today. Discussion in 'Film and Processing' started by mike_gammill, Feb 9, 2012. ( Log Out / 160 Film KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 160 Film features a significantly finer grain structure for improved scanning and enlargement capability in today's workflow, while retaining the exceptionally smooth and natural skin tone reproduction that the PORTRA Film family is renowned for. Compare Kodak Portra 400 vs Kodak Portra 160 vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Kodak T-Max 400. (please add 'portra' to your photos' tags) Digital photos with VSCO filters are NOT ALLOWED! The reproduction of the colors is restrained and quite refreshing, without really looking cool. For exposure testing data on Portra 400, Portra 400 shot and developed at 800, Portra 800, and 8 other film stocks, please refer to this article. Where Portra 800 tends to disappoint is when it’s under-exposed. Portra film also requires less available light (especially Portra 400 which has a very similar look to Kodak Portra 160)(or Kodak Portra 800). Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. Having shot through a fair amount of each stock, I honestly thought I would have gone with the Portra 800 across each example but I tended to only prefer it half the time. Cos its ace. I have a client who wants her daughter's wedding shot with film. Originally created in 1998, Kodak Portra film was made for portrait and wedding photography. For 35mm film I use Kodak Portra 160 and for medium format film normally Kodak Portra 400 and more recently Fuji Pro 400H again. As the name implies, it’s intended for portrait photography, but can be used for many other types of photography. kodak professional portra 160nc, 160vc, 400nc, 400vc, and 800 films • e-4040 4 Fluorescent and High-Intensity Discharge Lamps Use the color-compensating filters and exposure adjustments in the tables below as starting points to expose PORTRA Films FPP Gang at Macs Diner - New Portra 400 shot @ 6400, 2-stop push! You will be banned! The colors are intense but in a way that accentuates the present colors without changing them into something undesirable. KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400 Film KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA 400 is the world's finest grain high-speed color negative film. What changed between the two rolls is the light condition. Do you think the 400 will have fine enough grain for an 11x14 or should I stick with the 160. This has been available since mid-2011 in 135, 120, 220 and sheet format. For me, the most interesting shots came from the Portra 400. As observed above, however, whether you can hand-hold the bigger camera as well as the 35 is another issue, that may matter more to image quality. Los Angeles. PORTRA 400 Film is the ideal choice for Images made with 800 look more like a traditional color negative film, which is welcome considering how close to digital perfection images from Portra 160 and 400 can be. All told, we took 3 different sets of portraits (though only posting one) and in all 3, Portra 800 was far too saturated. 2 12 Share Tweet. Mike Gammill. Kodak Portra is a daylight balanced ISO 160 film famous for capturing natural skin tones. 4 seconds at f45, 1 stop soft GND filter. The Kodak Portra 160 is tuned to the reproduction of skin tones in the northwestern culture, he is primarily a portrait film. Kodak Portra. So thank you for showing!Drew Chambers is a former high school teacher and current master's student at Harvard University. Portra 160 and 400 Reciprocity Failure Surprisingly, the reciprocity failure for 160 and 400 seem to follow the exact same curve. Still, the grain in 400 Portra is not 250% larger than in 160 Portra, so the 6X9 is the right choice if grain is your concern. For us, Portra 400 has never been a big contender with Portra 800. PORTRA 160 Film is the ideal choice for portrait, fashion Kodak Portra 160 Film Review by Sarah Collier. If you're printing, say, 16x20 from 35mm then it might be worth going to 160, but up to 11x14 I think Portra 400 is a great film. At true ISO 400 speed, this film delivers spectacular skin tones plus exceptional color saturation over a wide range of lighting conditions. No. Samples of Kodak Portra 160. Change ). At that time, Kodak made natural (NC) and vivid (VC) versions. Kodak Professional Portra 800. Since 1998, Portra 400 has evolved from "VC" and "NC" into what we know it as now. The same streamlining happened with the ISO 160 Portra a year later, while the ISO 800 Portra was only ever available in a single version anyway. Portra 400 was introduced by Kodak in 1998, and was redesigned in 2006 and again in 2010. Very interesting, I have shot a few rolls of Portra 160, and just the one roll of Portra 800 which I pushed one stop – was very happy with the results! The Portra film lines are known for their their natural warmth (Portra 160 has red and brown undertones while Portra 400 has undertones of orange and yellow).