Présence au travail, pauses et repos hebdomadaire, Formation des travailleuses et travailleurs, Licenciement, mise à pied, congédiement et démission, Catégories de travailleuses et travailleurs, Travailleuses et travailleurs d’agences de placement de personnel, Travailleuses et travailleurs de l’industrie du vêtement, Travailleuses et travailleurs étrangers temporaires, Travailleuses et travailleurs saisonniers, Étudiantes et étudiants travaillant dans une colonie de vacances, Rechercher par type de risque ou domaine d'activité, Comment prendre en charge la santé et la sécurité du travail dans votre entreprise, Conditions gagnantes en santé et sécurité du travail, Des capsules de formation pour accompagner votre prise en charge, Conférence et entrevues vidéo avec nos experts, Programme de secourisme en milieu de travail. OMG HAII GUYS~~ I AM SO SO SO SO SO HAPPY THAT ARTICLE 13 HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED AND THAT I CAN CONTINUE MAKING VIDEOS FOR YOU!!!!! These include the Society of Authors, and the UK-based Alliance for Intellectual Property and Proponents. James Temperton, iStock/Antonio Guillem/Getty/Joe Sohm/Visions of America. – The games industry should be worried about Google Stadia, – How the petition to revoke Article 50 went viral, – I tried to keep my baby secret from Facebook and Google, – Care about online privacy? Evidence uncovered so far, including weapons and tactics seen on surveillance video, suggests a level of planning that has led investigators to believe the … Article 11 can be considered easier to comprehend than Article 13. European Parliament voted 348-274 to pass the Copyright Directive “Article 13 as written threatens to shut down the ability of millions of people — from creators like you to everyday users — to upload content to platforms like YouTube.” Her major stated concern is that by using filters to block copyrighted content, all copyrighted content could be blocked, even when it involves fair use. They form part of the wider regulations which were passed. Cette dernière transmet alors … YouTube's current Content ID gives copyright owners the right to claim ownership of content already live on YouTube. EU directives are a form of legislation that set an objective for member states to achieve. By The article intends to get news aggregator sites, such as Google News, to pay publishers for using snippets of their articles on their platforms. However, Article 13 makes no such requirement and in fact states that automated blocking should be avoided," Honeyball says in a statement. But it may also be a wake up call for site owners, not just in Europe but in the United States and around the world, not to fall victim to non-compliance. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country. Created Jun 13, 2018. "The greatest public space we've ever invented mustn't become a casualty of attempts to use copyright law to solve problems not caused by it in the first place. The passing of Article 13 in the European Parliament may be a disquieting sign of mass internet censorship. How much of an article has to be shared before a platform has to pay the publisher? Therefore one country may decide that "upload filters" should be implemented using one tool, while another may understand the law in a different. "Lawmakers looked at copyright primarily through one very particular lens: that of big media companies, with their waning control over distribution channels," she argued in an editorial. Article 13 (Modification intégrée au c. E-3, a. Not quite. The Directive states that platforms won’t have to pay if they’re sharing “mere hyperlinks which are accompanied by individual words,” but since most links are accompanied by more than a couple of words it seems that many platforms and news aggregators would fall foul of this rule. Required fields are marked * Comment. But as with the articles above, all of this depends on how the directive is interpreted by member states when they make it into national law. 1978, c. 5, a. Article 13. 13. In a tweet, the Prime Minister's office said that the entire directive "fuels censorship and threatens freedom of expression.". Proponents of the Directive on Copyright argue that this means that people are listening to, watching and reading copyrighted material without the creators being properly paid for it. Mary Honeyball, a British Labour MEP who supports Article 13, says. The Census Bureau is bound by Title 13 of the United States Code. Emiliano Mellino. Article 13 – we are independent sustainability consultants based in London, supporting clients globally. Sorry, you have entered an invalid email. "If the owners cannot agree, it is impossible to expect the open platforms that host this content to make the correct rights decisions. YouTube is by far the most vocal critic of Article 13, with the firm making a big effort to promote opposition to the directive among its creators and users. Les contenus de ce site sont informatifs et ont pour objectif d'aider à la compréhension. The Directive on Copyright has gained vocal critics on both sides of the debate, but you can broadly chunk up defenders and detractors into two categories. Although the Article 13 vote has been passed by the European Parliament, this doesn't mean its provisions take place straight away. This is the part of the Directive on Copyright that has most people worried. 6. On June 12 a large group of internet grandees including Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales and Tim Berners-Lee signed an open letter arguing against the Directive. The other side of the debate, critics of the Directive, include the influential Silicon Valley lobbying group the CCIA, whose members include Google, Facebook, eBay, Amazon and Netflix. This article states that “online content sharing service providers and right holders shall cooperate in good faith in order to ensure that unauthorised protected works or other subject matter are not available on their services.” You can read the full amended text of the entire Directive here. To help clear things up, here’s WIRED’s guide to the EU Directive on Copyright. Open my cookie preferences. But it's not completely over yet. Article offers stylish modern, mid century, and scandinavian furniture from world renowned designers at accessible prices. L'article 13 prévoit qu'il est possible de constituer, à l'aide des technologies, l'équivalent fonctionnel d'un sceau sur support papier ou d'un autre instrument semblable. TRIAL OFFER Gian Volpicelli. Article 13 of the EU's new copyright directive has sparked huge controversy online, with YouTube campaigning strongly against the proposal. Shop now. The Directive does contain an exemption for “legitimate private and non-commercial use of press publications by individual users,” so it doesn’t look like individuals sharing links on social platforms will have to dip into their pockets. So what does it mean? Chris Stokel-Walker, By It's become known by the most controversial segment, Article 13, which critics claim will have a detrimental impact on creators online. Six member states (Finland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden) voted against adopting the directive while three (Belgium, Estonia and Slovenia) abstained from the vote. "And, if implemented as proposed, Article 13 threatens hundreds of thousands of jobs, European creators, businesses, artists and everyone they employ," she continued, before directing readers to the take the argument to social media with the hashtag "#SaveYourInternet". ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Copyright in the Digital Single Market An earlier version of the Directive referred to “proportionate content recognition technologies” which sounds an awful lot like it’s asking platform owners to use automated filters to scan every piece of uploaded content and stop anything that might violate copyright from being uploaded. In your inbox every weekday at 12pm UK time. "The parliament’s approach is unrealistic in many cases because copyright owners often disagree over who owns what rights," she wrote. Unless the Polish court case changes anything – and that's a big if – individual member states will have two years to turn the new rules into their own national law. Each country within the EU will be able to interpret the law and how it should be implemented in its own ways. Article 13: Right to freedom of movement Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each State. There are still too many variables to know anything for sure, but it is a situation worth following. The system then allows them to either block the video or monetise it by running advertising against it. A subreddit for discussion of Article 13 of the *Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on copyright in the Digital Single Market* and how we can protest it. Clothilde Goujard. Until now, platforms have been accused of arbitrary decisions and practices. 13. Il est assez difficile de prédire comment les juges interpréteront ce concept vague et imprécis dans un dossier complexe, tel un dossie… However, Article 13 of the directive raises serious questions about the implications for free expression, creativity, and the freedom to publish. We help companies engage with their stakeholders to deliver sustainability strategies, materiality and reporting with a difference. Oliver Patel. The clocks change tonight – but it won’t happen for much longer, Thierry Breton’s guide to taking on Big Tech (and winning), Google and Microsoft staff set to join the UK’s first tech trade union, Stay Alert never made sense and now we’ve got the data to prove it, The big lesson from coronavirus? The issue of whether there is a violation of Article 13 is litigated in a pretrial motion hearing. Il est possible que la page que vous cherchez n'existe plus. In a second blog post on November 12 she said there were "unintended consequences" of Article 13. Although the #saveyourinternet campaign has focused on stirring up opposition to the directive among YouTubers and users, the highest echelons of YouTube management have also got in on the opposition. Registre d'accidents, d'incidents et de premiers secours, Connaitre et réaliser ses obligations d'équité salariale. Members. Boiled down, all this article is saying is that any websites that host large amounts of user-generated content (think YouTube, Twitter and Facebook) are responsible for taking down that content if it infringes on copyright. Moderators. Proponents of the legislation argue that memes are protected as parodies and so aren’t required to be removed under this directive, but others argue that filters won’t be able to distinguish between memes and other copyrighted material so they’d end up being caught in the crossfire anyway. In one reaction video the YouTuber Craig Thompson, who has just under half a million subscribers, summed it up like this: "Gamers are dead, you guys are dead, I'm dead, we're all dead, let's go drink.". On May 23, the Polish Prime Minister's office announced it would bring a court case against Article 13 to the Court of Justice of the European Union. James Temperton. Press publications “may obtain fair and proportionate remuneration for the digital use of their press publications by information society service providers,” the Directive states. Greg Williams. No one can quite agree how these platforms are expected to identify and remove this content. We need to listen to the experts, How London’s Silicon Roundabout dream turned into a nightmare, The end of Privacy Shield spells trouble for Brexit Britain, Here's why the UK is (finally) dumping Article 13 for good, The gloomy saga of Article 13 just got a whole lot worse, Inside the giant German protest trying to bring down Article 13, How the internet reacted to the European Union passing Article 13, European Union Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. In the video, Matt Koval, a content strategist at YouTube argues that – in its current form – Article 13 "threatens hundreds of thousands of creators, artists and others employed in the creative economy. Sur réception d’un acte introductif dans une affaire relevant de la division de la santé et de la sécurité du travail, le Tribunal en délivre une copie aux autres parties et à la Commission des normes, de l’équité, de la santé et de la sécurité du travail. The European Union Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market is a European Union directive that is designed to limit how copyrighted content is shared on online platforms. Article 13 CISG and Article 1:301(6) PECL neither expressly nor implicitly deal with other questions of interpretation of declarations, statements and communications by the parties (these are subject to Article 8 CISG and Articles 5:101 PECL et seq. After years of debate and negotiations, politicians have passed sweeping changes following a final vote in the European Parliament. Big changes are coming to online copyright across the European Union. Your email address will not be published. No one is really sure how this one would work either. Our freedom of expression online is too precious to be wasted as ammo in a corporate battle.". But even this is open to interpretation. Will Bedingfield, By On October 22, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki published a blogpost warning against the impact of the Directive. Or, aucun article du projet de règlement ne traite de cette question. Get WIRED Weekly, your essential catch-up on the most important, interesting and unusual WIRED stories from the past seven days. It’s this article that people think could be interpreted as requiring platforms to ban memes, but more on that later. This could put a stop to viral sports GIFs and might even stop people who attended matches from posting photos to social media. In June 2018 84 European music and media organisations, including Universal Music Group and Waner Music Group publicly declared their support for the Directive. It's an already unpopular system due to its propensity for false positives and abuse, and this would be heightened if potentially infringing videos could not be uploaded at all. 2). Historique d'un dossier Ce service en ligne vous donne accès au plumitif, c'est-à-dire l'historique des événements inscrits à votre dossier ou à tout autre dossier du Tribunal, et ce, de la réception de l'acte introductif jusqu'à la décision finale. You will hear from us shortly. The interest deduction limitation resulting from article 13l CITA may, in certain circumstances, not be allowed under EU law. R.R.Q., 1981, c. N-1.1, r. 3, a. Now it's time for another update. Get WIRED Daily, your no-nonsense briefing on all the biggest stories in technology, business and science. Please refresh and try again. Since then, Wojcicki has been writing again. ", Alongside the official YouTube explainer, the page hosts a handful of reaction and comment videos from prominent YouTubers. In favour of the Directive are industry bodies representing content producers. Consulter LATMP. Matt Reynolds. The only way a site that hosts user-generated content can avoid putting in place a upload filter is if it fulfils all three of the following criteria: it has been available for fewer than three years; it has an annual turnover below €10 million; it had fewer than five million unique monthly visitors. By Le membre fait preuve de réserve et de prudence dans son comportement public, notamment dans l’utilisation des technologies de l’information et des communications. Considering the recently issued guidance by the IFRS Interpretations Committee for Uncertain Tax Provisions (UTPs), a (re)assessment … A defense motion for Article 13 credit is generally made before pleas are entered. The Information We Collect and Process This site collects and processes two basic types of information: Personally identifiable information: This is information that personally identifies one individual from another or enables you to be individually contacted (for example, names, e-mail addresses and other contact information). Title 13, U.S. Code. A popup on the YouTube website and app directs users to a page with the title "#saveyourinternet" which includes a video from YouTube explaining the firm's objections to the directive. This site uses cookies to improve your experience and deliver personalised advertising. The reason why this article has been dubbed the “meme ban” is that no one is sure whether memes, which are often based on copyrighted images, will fall foul of these laws. Then change your phone number. Accident du travail et maladie professionnelle, Services en ligne et formulaires - Travailleurs, Agences de recrutement de travailleurs étrangers temporaires, Campagnes de sensibilisation et promotion. The final wording of Article 13 sets out exactly which platforms will need upload filters and which ones won't. Still, Article 13 could end up being a turning point in how users interact with content online. Qui paie la formation pour le secourisme en milieu de travail? Article 13 says it shall “in no way affect legitimate uses.” In other words, users will still be able to use bits of copyright-protected material for the … Notre site s'est métamorphosé pour mieux vous servir. It will now be up to the EU's member states to enact Article 13 and the Copyright Directive. These laws not only provide authority for the work we do, but also provide strong protection for the information we collect from individuals and businesses. The Directive on Copyright would make online platforms and aggregator sites liable for copyright infringements, and supposedly direct more revenue from tech giants towards artists and journalists. La semaine normale de travail du salarié qui effectue des travaux sur le territoire de la région de la Baie-James est de 55 heures. By Under Article 13 ordinary people will have more legal security to post and share content. But things aren’t quite that simple. Article 12a might stop anyone who isn’t the official organiser of a sports match from posting any videos or photos of that match. It’s worth noting that despite the Directive including an exception that explicitly excludes Wikipedia and GitHub from these rules, both companies have maintained their opposition to the Directive. Quoi faire si un accident du travail survient dans votre entreprise? Consulter l'article # Lancer la recherche d'un LATMP. On April 15, 2019, the European Council – the political body composed of government ministers from each of the 28 EU member states – voted to adopt into EU law the copyright directive as passed by the European Parliament in March.